On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:29 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<phi...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> We don't need to explicit this obvious switch fall through.
> Stay consistent with the rest of the codebase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Aleksandar Markovic <amarko...@wavecomp.com>

> Cc: Peter Chubb <peter.ch...@nicta.com.au>
> Cc: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smir...@gmail.com>
> Cc: qemu-...@nongnu.org
> ---
>  hw/pci-host/designware.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci-host/designware.c b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> index 71e9b0d9b5..dd245516dd 100644
> --- a/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> +++ b/hw/pci-host/designware.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ designware_pcie_root_config_read(PCIDevice *d, uint32_t 
> address, int len)
>          break;
>
>      case DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ATU_CR1:
> -    case DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ATU_CR2:          /* FALLTHROUGH */
> +    case DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ATU_CR2:
>          val = viewport->cr[(address - DESIGNWARE_PCIE_ATU_CR1) /
>                             sizeof(uint32_t)];
>          break;
> --
> 2.21.0
>
>

Reply via email to