From: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com> Per the ACPI spec (version 6.1, section 6.1.5 _HID) it is not required on enumerated buses (like PCI in this case), _ADR is required (and is already there). And the _HID value is wrong. Linux appears to ignore the _HID entry, but it confuses Windows.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> --- hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c index 7b8da62d41..ab73a8f4c8 100644 --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c @@ -1815,7 +1815,6 @@ static void build_smb0(Aml *table, I2CBus *smbus, int devnr, int func) Aml *scope = aml_scope("_SB.PCI0"); Aml *dev = aml_device("SMB0"); - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_eisaid("APP0005"))); aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(devnr << 16 | func))); build_acpi_ipmi_devices(dev, BUS(smbus), "\\_SB.PCI0.SMB0"); aml_append(scope, dev); -- 2.17.1