On 1/21/20 11:53 PM, Ian Jiang wrote:
> --
> Ian Jiang
>
> Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> 于2020年1月22日周三 下午4:53写道：
>>
>> On 1/21/20 9:24 PM, Ian Jiang wrote:
>>> For FMV.W.X that moves the lower 32 bits of an integer register to a
>>> floating-point register, Rd should encoded with NoN-boxing scheme.
>>> Note: This applies to RV64 only.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Jiang <ianjiang....@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
>>> b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
>>> index 172dbfa919..62b7a36567 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
>>> @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ static bool trans_fmv_w_x(DisasContext *ctx,
>>> arg_fmv_w_x *a)
>>>
>>> #if defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>>> tcg_gen_mov_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], t0);
>>> + tcg_gen_ori_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rd], 0xffffffff00000000ULL);
>>> #else
>>> tcg_gen_extu_i32_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], t0);
>>> #endif
>>>
>>
>> This doesn't look right. There's nothing in the spec that says the
>> nan-boxing
>> is restricted to rv64. NaN-boxing is all about FLEN, not XLEN.
>>
>
> Why the translation of FLW has a NaN-boxing?
>
> file ./target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.inc.c
> 26 static bool trans_flw(DisasContext *ctx, arg_flw *a)
> 27 {
> ...
> 34 tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], t0, ctx->mem_idx, MO_TEUL);
> 35 /* RISC-V requires NaN-boxing of narrower width floating point values
> */
> 36 tcg_gen_ori_i64(cpu_fpr[a->rd], cpu_fpr[a->rd],
> 0xffffffff00000000ULL);
> ...
> 41 }
Eh? Obviously because we're loading a 32-bit value into a FLEN=64 bit register.
(Except when we've selected a cpu without RVD, I suppose, but in that case this
nan-boxing is both harmless and invisible.)
r~
