On 18/02/20 12:01, Peter Maydell wrote: > I could break this down into separate patches by submaintainer, > but the patch is not that large and I would argue that it's > better for the project if we can try to avoid introducing too > much friction into the process of doing 'safe' tree-wide > minor refactorings. > --- > accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 6 ++-- > dma-helpers.c | 4 +-- > exec.c | 4 +-- > hw/dma/xlnx-zdma.c | 11 +++---- > hw/net/dp8393x.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > hw/net/i82596.c | 25 +++++++------- > hw/net/lasi_i82596.c | 5 +-- > hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c | 8 ++--- > hw/s390x/css.c | 12 +++---- > qtest.c | 52 +++++++++++++++--------------- > target/i386/hvf/x86_mmu.c | 12 +++---- > 11 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
I agree, but please include the semantic patch in scripts/coccinelle/. Thanks, Paolo