On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 11:19, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 18/02/20 12:01, Peter Maydell wrote: > > I could break this down into separate patches by submaintainer, > > but the patch is not that large and I would argue that it's > > better for the project if we can try to avoid introducing too > > much friction into the process of doing 'safe' tree-wide > > minor refactorings. > > --- > > accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 6 ++-- > > dma-helpers.c | 4 +-- > > exec.c | 4 +-- > > hw/dma/xlnx-zdma.c | 11 +++---- > > hw/net/dp8393x.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > > hw/net/i82596.c | 25 +++++++------- > > hw/net/lasi_i82596.c | 5 +-- > > hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c | 8 ++--- > > hw/s390x/css.c | 12 +++---- > > qtest.c | 52 +++++++++++++++--------------- > > target/i386/hvf/x86_mmu.c | 12 +++---- > > 11 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-) > > I agree, but please include the semantic patch in scripts/coccinelle/.
I'd forgotten we had that. v2 sent. -- PMM
