On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:13:05 -0400 Stefan Berger <stef...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 4/28/20 6:38 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:31:43 +0200 > > Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Instead of using a compat in the mach-virt machine to force > >> PPI off for all virt machines (PPI not supported by the > >> tpm-tis-device device), let's simply change the default value > >> in the sysbus device. > >> > >> Best Regards > >> > >> Eric > >> > >> Eric Auger (2): > >> tpm: tpm-tis-device: set PPI to false by default > >> hw/arm/virt: Remove the compat forcing tpm-tis-device PPI to off > >> > >> hw/arm/virt.c | 5 ----- > >> hw/tpm/tpm_tis_sysbus.c | 2 +- > >> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > > I think we can apply the compat machines patch on top of these two > > patches. > > > > Q: Who will queue this and the machine types patch? It feels a bit > > weird taking arm patches through the s390 tree :) > > > I can queue them and would send the PR soon. I am also fine with someone > else doing it. Would be great if you could queue these together with https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200424090314.544-1-coh...@redhat.com/ (hopefully should still apply cleanly, let me know if a respin is needed).
