Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
Once here, can someone give a test that meassures if it makes sense that this functions are inline? They are relatively big, and I would preffer them to be in a .c file, but I have no clue about how performance critical they are. Again, this include was another of the reasons that migration/ram.c can't be make target agnostic. Later, Juan.
