On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 17:48, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> wrote:
> Various places ignore the MemTxResult indicator of
> transaction failed. Some cases might be justified
> (DMA?) while other are probably bugs. To avoid
> ignoring transaction errors, suggestion is to mark
> functions returning MemTxResult with
> warn_unused_result attribute.

Not necessarily a bad idea, but don't we have an awful
lot of places that ignore the result that we'd need
to fix first?

-- PMM

Reply via email to