On 200526 1105, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 5/26/20 10:56 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:58:18AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >> Hi Alexander, > >> > >> I forgot to share these 2 patches wrote before > >> the direct MemoryRegion fuzzer sent yesterday. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Phil. > >> > >> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2): > >> tests/qtest/fuzz: Avoid QTest ioport serialization > >> tests/qtest/fuzz: Avoid QTest mmio serialization > >> > >> tests/qtest/fuzz/i440fx_fuzz.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ > >> tests/qtest/fuzz/virtio_net_fuzz.c | 6 ++++-- > >> tests/qtest/fuzz/virtio_scsi_fuzz.c | 6 +++++- > >> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > Will it still be possible to print qtest reproducer commands when a > > crash is found? > > Yes, there is no change in the corpus format.
Yes, though with these patches, the qtest-based code will be gone. Should there be some option to switch between the two modes? > > > > Other than this concern, higher fuzzing rates would be great. > > Thanks, > > Phil.