Hi, The third report of the TCG Continuous Benchmarking series utilizes the tools presented in the previous report for comparing the performance of 17 different targets across two versions of QEMU. The two versions addressed are 5.0 and 5.1-pre-soft-freeze (current state of QEMU).
After summarizing the results, the report utilizes the KCachegrind tool and dives into the analysis of why all three PowerPC targets (ppc, ppc64, ppc64le) had a performance degradation between the two QEMU versions. Report link: https://ahmedkrmn.github.io/TCG-Continuous-Benchmarking/QEMU-5.0-and-5.1-pre-soft-freeze-Dissect-Comparison/ Previous reports: Report 1 - Measuring Basic Performance Metrics of QEMU: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-06/msg06692.html Report 2 - Dissecting QEMU Into Three Main Parts: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-06/msg09441.html Best regards, Ahmed Karaman
