On 08/01/2011 05:23 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
The char layer tries very hard to avoid using an intermediate buffer. The
implication of this is that when the backend does a write(), the data for that
write must be immediately passed to the front end.
Flow control is needed to handle the likely event that the front end is not
able to handle the data at this point in time. We implement flow control
today by allowing the front ends to register a polling function. The polling
function returns non-zero when it is able to receive data.
This works okay because most backends are tied to some sort of file descriptor
and our main loop allows polling to be included with file descriptor
registration.
This falls completely apart when dealing with the front end writing to the
back end though because the front end (devices) don't have an obvious place to
integrate polling.
Short summary: we're broken by design. A way to fix this is to eliminate
polling entirely and use a Unix style flow control mechanism. This involves
using an intermediate buffer and allowing registration of notifications when
the buffer either has data in it (readability) or is not full (writability).
If you don't have an obvious place to integrate polling, how do you poll
for writability?
Although, providing a reasonably sized buffer and blocking the vcpu when
it's full is a lot better than what we have now.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function