On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:15:17 -0400 Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The existing pointer property getters/setters are awkward because > they are expected to work with const variables. If we remove > that requirement, they can become a lot simpler and simply call > the visit_type_uint*() functions directly. see my reply on 'qom: Make all -object types use only class properties' thread. we should drop pointer property getters/setter instead of extending it. > > Git tree: https://github.com/ehabkost/qemu work/qom-ptr-prop-not-const > Based-on: 20201009160122.1662082-1-ehabk...@redhat.com > > Eduardo Habkost (3): > acpi: Don't pass const pointers to object_property_add_uint*_ptr() > qom: Make object_property_add_uint*_ptr() get non-const pointers > qom: Simplify and merge pointer property getters/setters > > include/qom/object.h | 8 +-- > hw/acpi/ich9.c | 2 +- > hw/acpi/piix4.c | 10 ++-- > hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 4 +- > qom/object.c | 122 +++++++++---------------------------------- > 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-) >
