On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 08:47:00PM +0100, Claudio Fontana wrote: > On 11/27/20 8:04 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: [...] > > Maybe we should rename CPUClass.synchronize_from_tb to > > CPUClass.tcg_synchronize_from_tb? Maybe we should have a > > possibly, yes. > > > separate TCGCpuOperations struct to carry TCG-specific methods? > > > interesting, will think about it.
I'm working on it at: https://gitlab.com/ehabkost/qemu/-/commits/work/tcg-cpu-ops Feel free to reuse it, if you want to do it before your series. Otherwise, I can rebase it after your series is merged. I didn't touch do_interrupt(), because of the aarch64 weirdness. -- Eduardo
