On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
modetty is not handled by kernel and the parameter
here seems unreasonable.

Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com>
---
v3: Bring busclock back
---
hw/mips/fuloong2e.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c b/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c
index d846ef7b00..c4843dd15e 100644
--- a/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c
+++ b/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c
@@ -159,10 +159,8 @@ static uint64_t load_kernel(CPUMIPSState *env)
    }

    /* Setup minimum environment variables */
-    prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "busclock=33000000");

Commit message does not mention removing this as well. Was this unintentionally left here?

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

    prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "cpuclock=100000000");
    prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "memsize=%"PRIi64, loaderparams.ram_size / MiB);
-    prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "modetty0=38400n8r");
    prom_set(prom_buf, index++, NULL);

    rom_add_blob_fixed("prom", prom_buf, prom_size, ENVP_PADDR);


Reply via email to