On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:47:26 +1100 David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 06:04:27AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 11:09:06 +1100 > > David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:01:13AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > > On 3/29/21 10:54 PM, David Gibson wrote: > > > > > B) Just the hflags patches from my / Richard's tree > > > > > https://gitlab.com/dgibson/qemu/-/pipelines/278497244 > > > > > > > > Look closer at this one -- it's an s390x test that's failing: > > > > > > > > I've been seeing errors with s390x as well in CI but I couldn't > > reproduce locally... and of course, now it seems I cannot > > reproduce locally with ppc64abi32 either :-\ > > Huh. Well supporting the idea that the issues I've seen on gitlab > were just bad luck, I've now gotten a clean check with the hflags > patches... bug only on my ppc-for-6.1 branch. > > The ppc64 bug that Greg was seeing still makes me nervous, as does the > failures which we saw at one point which showed that new hflags assert > explicitly failing. > > Since the hflags stuff is of moderate complexity and is a bug fix, > it's not a regression fix. So, I'm going to postpone that until > ppc-for-6.1, and move ahead with this PR without it. > > Richard - the remaining possible problem with the hflags stuff seems > to manifest with the assert failing in the last patch. However, I'm > guess that's just exposing some more subtle problem introduced by an > earlier patch. Any chance you could re-order the series to insert the > assert near the beginning, which might give us a better way of > bisecting if this shows up again. > > Greg, if this shows up again for you locally, can you please try to > track it down. > Will do. Cheers, -- Greg
pgpHZB11Fiw_9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
