On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 14:32:11 +0200 Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 4/8/21 11:02 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 19:47:11 +0200 > > Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > >> So this begs the question, do we need this fixed for old releases as well? > >> > >> My answer is yes we do. Conny what do you think? > > > > What do you mean with "old releases"? The dstream rework was in 2.11, > > and I doubt that anyone is using anything older, or a downstream > > release that is based on pre-2.11. > > > > If you mean "include in stable", then yes, we can do that; if we want > > the commit in 6.0, I need the final version soon. > > > > > > OK, are you OK with the two change propositions I sent? > > 1) let the 3270 decide for internal errors (-EIO) but return the error > for CSS errors in handle_payload_3270_write() > > 2) for senseid, always ask CSS to update the residual count > but only erase the senseid if the write succeeded > > I think both make sense.
