On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:00:35PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > @@ -3097,9 +3097,10 @@ static void lo_copy_file_range(fuse_req_t req, > fuse_ino_t ino_in, off_t off_in, > > fuse_log(FUSE_LOG_DEBUG, > "lo_copy_file_range(ino=%" PRIu64 "/fd=%d, " > - "off=%lu, ino=%" PRIu64 "/fd=%d, " > - "off=%lu, size=%zd, flags=0x%x)\n", > - ino_in, in_fd, off_in, ino_out, out_fd, off_out, len, flags); > + "off=%ju, ino=%" PRIu64 "/fd=%d, " > + "off=%ju, size=%zd, flags=0x%x)\n", > + ino_in, in_fd, (intmax_t)off_in, > + ino_out, out_fd, (intmax_t)off_out, len, flags);
The rest of the patch used uint64_t. Why intmax_t here? Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
