On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:33:53 -0700 Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
> Version 2 splits lazy do-it-all patch. > Patch 1 has an additional fix, so I dropped the r-b. > > r~ > > Richard Henderson (15): > linux-user/s390x: Fix sigframe types > linux-user/s390x: Use uint16_t for signal retcode > linux-user/s390x: Remove PSW_ADDR_AMODE > linux-user/s390x: Remove restore_sigregs return value > linux-user/s390x: Fix trace in restore_regs > linux-user/s390x: Fix sigcontext sregs value > linux-user/s390x: Use tswap_sigset in setup_rt_frame > linux-user/s390x: Tidy save_sigregs > linux-user/s390x: Clean up single-use gotos in signal.c > linux-user/s390x: Set psw.mask properly for the signal handler > linux-user/s390x: Add stub sigframe argument for last_break > linux-user/s390x: Fix frame_addr corruption in setup_frame > linux-user/s390x: Add build asserts for sigset sizes > linux-user/s390x: Clean up signal.c > linux-user/s390x: Handle vector regs in signal stack > > linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 280 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-) > I assume the route-to-upstream for this is through the linux-user tree and not the s390x tree, right?
