Le 06/05/2021 à 13:54, Cornelia Huck a écrit : > On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:33:53 -0700 > Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> Version 2 splits lazy do-it-all patch. >> Patch 1 has an additional fix, so I dropped the r-b. >> >> r~ >> >> Richard Henderson (15): >> linux-user/s390x: Fix sigframe types >> linux-user/s390x: Use uint16_t for signal retcode >> linux-user/s390x: Remove PSW_ADDR_AMODE >> linux-user/s390x: Remove restore_sigregs return value >> linux-user/s390x: Fix trace in restore_regs >> linux-user/s390x: Fix sigcontext sregs value >> linux-user/s390x: Use tswap_sigset in setup_rt_frame >> linux-user/s390x: Tidy save_sigregs >> linux-user/s390x: Clean up single-use gotos in signal.c >> linux-user/s390x: Set psw.mask properly for the signal handler >> linux-user/s390x: Add stub sigframe argument for last_break >> linux-user/s390x: Fix frame_addr corruption in setup_frame >> linux-user/s390x: Add build asserts for sigset sizes >> linux-user/s390x: Clean up signal.c >> linux-user/s390x: Handle vector regs in signal stack >> >> linux-user/s390x/signal.c | 280 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> 1 file changed, 170 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-) >> > > I assume the route-to-upstream for this is through the linux-user tree > and not the s390x tree, right? >
Yes, and I'll try to do a PR soon. Thanks, Laurent
