On 6/2/21 4:22 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> This patch was supposed to go via Eduardo's tree but he
>> missed it, can it go via qemu-trivial instead?
>
> My apologies, again. I'm still behind on my qemu-devel backlog,
> and this was still buried in my inbox.
>
>>
>> On 2/19/21 7:01 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Ensure sev_fw_errlist[] is updated after running
>>> the update-linux-headers.sh script.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> Based-on: <20210218151633.215374-1-cku...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> target/i386/sev.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c
>>> index 37690ae809c..92c69a23769 100644
>>> --- a/target/i386/sev.c
>>> +++ b/target/i386/sev.c
>>> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ typedef struct __attribute__((__packed__)) SevInfoBlock {
>>> static SevGuestState *sev_guest;
>>> static Error *sev_mig_blocker;
>>>
>>> -static const char *const sev_fw_errlist[] = {
>>> +static const char *const sev_fw_errlist[SEV_RET_MAX] = {
>>> [SEV_RET_SUCCESS] = "",
>>> [SEV_RET_INVALID_PLATFORM_STATE] = "Platform state is invalid",
>>> [SEV_RET_INVALID_GUEST_STATE] = "Guest state is invalid",
>>> @@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ static const char *const sev_fw_errlist[] = {
>>> [SEV_RET_RESOURCE_LIMIT] = "Required firmware resource
>>> depleted",
>>> [SEV_RET_SECURE_DATA_INVALID] = "Part-specific integrity check
>>> failure",
>>> };
>>> +/* Ensure sev_fw_errlist[] is updated after running
>>> update-linux-headers.sh */
>>> +QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(SEV_RET_SECURE_DATA_INVALID + 1 != SEV_RET_MAX);
>
> A mechanism to notify us when sev_fw_errlist needs to be updated
> would be useful, but I'm not sure I agree with this change.
> I expect update-linux-headers patches always consist of 100%
> automated changes. This patch would require a manual update of
> target/i386/sev.c to be included in the same commit as
> the header update.
OK :(
