On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 20:29, Patrick Venture <vent...@google.com> wrote: > > Add line item reference to quanta-gbs-bmc machine. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <vent...@google.com> > --- > docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst b/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst > index ca011bd479..197d149f66 100644 > --- a/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst > +++ b/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -Nuvoton iBMC boards (``npcm750-evb``, ``quanta-gsj``) > +Nuvoton iBMC boards (``*-bmc``, ``npcm750-evb``, ``quanta-gsj``) > ===================================================== > > The `Nuvoton iBMC`_ chips (NPCM7xx) are a family of ARM-based SoCs that are > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ segment. The following machines are based on this chip : > The NPCM730 SoC has two Cortex-A9 cores and is targeted for Data Center and > Hyperscale applications. The following machines are based on this chip : > > +- ``quanta-gbs-bmc`` Quanta GBS server BMC > - ``quanta-gsj`` Quanta GSJ server BMC
Why aren't we consistent about the names of the machines here? This suggests that either we should have called the new board 'quanta-gbs', not 'quanta-gbs-bmc', or we should deprecate 'quanta-gsj' and rename it 'quanta-gsj-bmc' ... thanks -- PMM
