On 6/21/21 3:31 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 20:29, Patrick Venture <vent...@google.com> wrote: >> >> Add line item reference to quanta-gbs-bmc machine. >> >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <vent...@google.com> >> --- >> docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst b/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst >> index ca011bd479..197d149f66 100644 >> --- a/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst >> +++ b/docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst >> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ >> -Nuvoton iBMC boards (``npcm750-evb``, ``quanta-gsj``) >> +Nuvoton iBMC boards (``*-bmc``, ``npcm750-evb``, ``quanta-gsj``) >> ===================================================== >> >> The `Nuvoton iBMC`_ chips (NPCM7xx) are a family of ARM-based SoCs that are >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ segment. The following machines are based on this chip : >> The NPCM730 SoC has two Cortex-A9 cores and is targeted for Data Center and >> Hyperscale applications. The following machines are based on this chip : >> >> +- ``quanta-gbs-bmc`` Quanta GBS server BMC >> - ``quanta-gsj`` Quanta GSJ server BMC > > Why aren't we consistent about the names of the machines here? > This suggests that either we should have called the new board > 'quanta-gbs', not 'quanta-gbs-bmc', or we should deprecate > 'quanta-gsj' and rename it 'quanta-gsj-bmc' ...
Indeed, the latter would be the best option. Thanks, C.
