On Tue, 3 Aug 2021 at 01:37, ishii.shuuic...@fujitsu.com <ishii.shuuic...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > I'm afraid this isn't the way a v2 patchseries should be structured. > > The idea is that a v2 series should be complete in itself, not based on > > whatever v1 > > was. So when you make the changes requested in review of v1, you update the > > commits in your local git branch, and then you send out the patches as the > > v2. v2 > > should apply cleanly on to master, and all the patches in it should be > > logically > > separated out changes (with no "patch 1 makes a change and then patch 2 > > changes the code that was added in patch 1" effects). > > Thank you for comments. > We apologize for the inconvenience caused by our lack of understanding. > I understood your point. > > Just to confirm, > should I update to v3 and resubmit it as a patch series based on the points > you mentioned?
Yes, please. thanks -- PMM
