On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote: > This new field is an alternative to lo_inode.fd: Either of the two must > be set. In case an O_PATH FD is needed for some lo_inode, it is either > taken from lo_inode.fd, if valid, or a temporary FD is opened with > open_by_handle_at(). > > Using a file handle instead of an FD has the advantage of keeping the > number of open file descriptors low. > > Because open_by_handle_at() requires a mount FD (i.e. a non-O_PATH FD > opened on the filesystem to which the file handle refers), but every > lo_fhandle only has a mount ID (as returned by name_to_handle_at()), we > keep a hash map of such FDs in mount_fds (mapping ID to FD). > get_file_handle(), which is added by a later patch, will ensure that > every mount ID for which we have generated a handle has a corresponding > entry in mount_fds. > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Connor Kuehl <cku...@redhat.com> > --- > tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- > tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c | 1 + > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > index 292b7f7e27..487448d666 100644 > --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c > @@ -88,8 +88,25 @@ struct lo_key { > uint64_t mnt_id; > }; > > +struct lo_fhandle { > + union { > + struct file_handle handle; > + char padding[sizeof(struct file_handle) + MAX_HANDLE_SZ]; > + }; > + int mount_id; > +}; > + > +/* Maps mount IDs to an FD that we can pass to open_by_handle_at() */ > +static GHashTable *mount_fds; > +pthread_rwlock_t mount_fds_lock = PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER; > +
How about if we move this hash table inside "struct lo_data". That seems to be one global data structure keeping all the info. Also it can be cleaned up during lo_destroy(). Thanks Vivek