On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 6:21 PM Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 17:01:28 +0530 > Ani Sinha <a...@anisinha.ca> wrote: > > > With the current smbios table assignment code, we can have only 512 DIMM > > slots > it's a bit confusing, since it's not DIMM slots in QEMU sense (we do not > expose > DIMM devices via SMBIOS/E820). So maybe clarify here that initial RAM is split > into 16GB (with 'DIMM' type ) chunks/entries when it's described in SMBIOS > table 17. > > > (each DIMM of 16 GiB in size) before tables 17 and 19 conflict with their > > addresses. > > Are you sure it's addresses that are wrong?
I don't know why I had this pre conception of memory corruption and overlapping addresses! Even the BZ says table handles overlap. Grr ... doing too much multiplexing these days :(
