On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 04:36:45PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> reimplement qemu_img() in terms of qemu_tool() in preparation for doing
> the same with qemu_io().
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> index 6cd8374c81..974a2b0c8d 100644
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py
> @@ -207,15 +207,13 @@ def qemu_img_create_prepare_args(args: List[str]) -> 
> List[str]:
>  
>      return result
>  
> -def qemu_img(*args: str, check: bool = True, combine_stdio: bool = True
> +
> +def qemu_tool(*args: str, check: bool = True, combine_stdio: bool = True
>               ) -> subprocess.CompletedProcess[str]:

Does this line need reindentation?

> @@ -227,14 +225,13 @@ def qemu_img(*args: str, check: bool = True, 
> combine_stdio: bool = True
>          handled, the command-line, return code, and all console output
>          will be included at the bottom of the stack trace.
>  
> -    :return: a CompletedProcess. This object has args, returncode, and
> -        stdout properties. If streams are not combined, it will also
> -        have a stderr property.
> +    :return:
> +        A CompletedProcess. This object has args, returncode, and stdout
> +        properties. If streams are not combined, it will also have a
> +        stderr property.

Should this reflow be squashed in some earlier patch?

As those are both cosemetic only,

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


Reply via email to