It looks nicer if we separate the run_ccw() from the IPL_assert()
statement, and the error message should talk about "virtio device"
instead of "block device", since this code is nowadays used for
non-block (i.e. network) devices, too.
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <far...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
---
pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
index d8c2b52710..f37510f312 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
@@ -289,9 +289,8 @@ void virtio_setup_ccw(VDev *vdev)
.num = 0,
};
- IPL_assert(
- run_ccw(vdev, CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF, &config, sizeof(config),
false) == 0,
- "Could not get block device VQ configuration");
+ rc = run_ccw(vdev, CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF, &config, sizeof(config),
false);
+ IPL_assert(rc == 0, "Could not get virtio device VQ configuration");
info.num = config.num;
vring_init(&vdev->vrings[i], &info);
vdev->vrings[i].schid = vdev->schid;
--
2.31.1
