"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote: > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: >> We used to return two bools, just return a single int with the >> following meaning: >> >> old return / again / new return >> false false 0 >> false true 1 >> true true 2 /* We don't care about again at all */ > > We shouldn't use magic numbers; if you want to return it in a single > value then it should be an enum so it is clear.
I need to also return an error in the following patches. I am not sure if it clearer to try to change to an enum. Will try and see. Later, Juan.
