On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 5:06 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:25:08AM -0700, Peter Delevoryas wrote: > > On macOS, private $TMPDIR's are the default. These $TMPDIR's are > > generated from a user's unix UID and UUID [1], which can create a > > relatively long path: > > > > /var/folders/d7/rz20f6hd709c1ty8f6_6y_z40000gn/T/ > > > > QEMU's avocado tests create a temporary directory prefixed by > > "avo_qemu_sock_", and create QMP sockets within _that_ as well. > > The QMP socket is unnecessarily long, because a temporary directory > > is created for every QEMUMachine object. > > > > /avo_qemu_sock_uh3w_dgc/qemu-37331-10bacf110-monitor.sock > > > > The path limit for unix sockets on macOS is 104: [2] > > > > /* > > * [XSI] Definitions for UNIX IPC domain. > > */ > > struct sockaddr_un { > > unsigned char sun_len; /* sockaddr len including null */ > > sa_family_t sun_family; /* [XSI] AF_UNIX */ > > char sun_path[104]; /* [XSI] path name (gag) */ > > }; > > > > This results in avocado tests failing on macOS because the QMP unix > > socket can't be created, because the path is too long: > > > > ERROR| Failed to establish connection: OSError: AF_UNIX path too long > > > > This change resolves by reducing the size of the socket directory prefix > > and the suffix on the QMP and console socket names. > > > > The result is paths like this: > > > > pdel@pdel-mbp:/var/folders/d7/rz20f6hd709c1ty8f6_6y_z40000gn/T > > $ tree qemu* > > qemu_df4evjeq > > qemu_jbxel3gy > > qemu_ml9s_gg7 > > qemu_oc7h7f3u > > qemu_oqb1yf97 > > ├── 10a004050.con > > └── 10a004050.qmp > > > > [1] > > https://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/353832/why-is-mac-osx-temp-directory-in-weird-path > > [2] > > /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX12.3.sdk/usr/include/sys/un.h > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pe...@pjd.dev> > > --- > > python/qemu/machine/machine.py | 6 +++--- > > tests/avocado/avocado_qemu/__init__.py | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
My apologies, I missed this update because it appeared in a thread underneath the old version. Peter, may I please ask for you to kindly re-submit this patch with an incremented version number? --js