On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 01:30:19PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 14/1/23 18:01, Peter Delevoryas wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pe...@pjd.dev> > > --- > > hw/arm/aspeed.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c > > index c929c61d582a..4ac8ff11a835 100644 > > --- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c > > +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c > > @@ -922,6 +922,52 @@ static void bletchley_bmc_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState > > *bmc) > > i2c_slave_create_simple(i2c[12], TYPE_PCA9552, 0x67); > > } > > +static const uint8_t fby35_bmc_fruid[] = { > [...] > > > +}; > > + > > static void fby35_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState *bmc) > > { > > AspeedSoCState *soc = &bmc->soc; > > @@ -1363,6 +1409,9 @@ static void fby35_reset(MachineState *state, > > ShutdownCause reason) > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(gpio), "gpioB3", false, &error_fatal); > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(gpio), "gpioB4", false, &error_fatal); > > object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(gpio), "gpioB5", false, &error_fatal); > > + > > + at24c_eeprom_write(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&bmc->soc.i2c, 11), > > + 0x54, 0, fby35_bmc_fruid, sizeof(fby35_bmc_fruid)); > > Why transfer the prom content on the i2c bus at each reset? > > In particular this looks wrong if the prom is initialized with a 'drive' > block backend (using -global).
Yeah, it looks like this might not be the right way to model it. I'm going to try Cedric's suggestions. > > > } > >