On 1/26/23 07:12, Alex Bennée wrote:
+ ts -= ts->temp_subindex;This seems a bit magic to me. Are we saying we always know there are TCGTemps "behind" ts because that is implied by temp_subindex?
Not "implied" so much as "defined".
It might be worth doing some documentation of the various parts of TCGTemp to help follow this.
Ok. r~
