On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 08:26:21AM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 06:08:10 PST (-0800), suni...@ventanamicro.com wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 05:44:44AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2/14/23 00:43, Sunil V L wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 03:48:04PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > > > > > > Nah. Doing that now will make this series rely on acks for every other > > > ACPI arch to > > > push the RISC-V side. > > > > > > Let's make this happen as is now to get ACPI in RISC-V working. We can > > > think about > > > reducing overall ACPI duplication later. IMO it's enough for now to, > > > mention in this > > > commit msg, which bits of the arm64 virt-acpi-build.c you changed for > > > this RISC-V > > > version. > > > > > > > Okay. Thanks!. Will update the commit message and send the V3 soon. > > I'm checking up on this one as I don't see a v3 on the lists. No rush on my > end, I'm just trying to make sure I don't drop the ball on anything from the > backlog as I'm catching up. > Thanks!, Plamer. I have sent V3 which is based on Alistair's riscv-to-apply.next branch.
Thanks, Sunil
