On 01/24/2012 08:13 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/24/2012 04:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-24 15:05, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/19/2012 08:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Nope, see kvm_irqchip_create, patch 13. You can also check by browsing
the qtree (different device model names).
That was my biggest objection to the previous iterations. Later
versions changed to use an attribute (selecting the backend). What
happened now?
The other approach was rejected.
Sigh. We'll regret this.
No we won't. The other approach was creating a mini-qdev as a mechanism to hide
the fact that we have two different implementations of the same device.
We need to expose this information to the user in some fashion. The type is the
natural way to do it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Moreover, see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/129659,
QOM will allow addressing with identical paths.
At least that.
