On 5/30/23 04:02, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2023/05/30 0:07, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 5/29/23 09:45, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2023/05/29 16:01, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 5/29/23 04:45, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
On 2023/05/28 19:50, Sriram Yagnaraman wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, 26 May 2023 19:31
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>; Sriram Yagnaraman
<sriram.yagnara...@est.tech>; Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>; Cédric
Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] igb: Add Function Level Reset to PF and VF

The Intel 82576EB GbE Controller say that the Physical and Virtual Functions
support Function Level Reset. Add the capability to each device model.

Cc: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
Fixes: 3a977deebe6b ("Intrdocue igb device emulation")
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
---
  hw/net/igb.c   | 3 +++
  hw/net/igbvf.c | 3 +++
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/net/igb.c b/hw/net/igb.c index 1c989d767725..08e389338dca
100644
--- a/hw/net/igb.c
+++ b/hw/net/igb.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static void igb_write_config(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t
addr,

      trace_igb_write_config(addr, val, len);
      pci_default_write_config(dev, addr, val, len);
+    pcie_cap_flr_write_config(dev, addr, val, len);

      if (range_covers_byte(addr, len, PCI_COMMAND) &&
          (dev->config[PCI_COMMAND] & PCI_COMMAND_MASTER)) { @@ -427,6
+428,8 @@ static void igb_pci_realize(PCIDevice *pci_dev, Error **errp)
      }

      /* PCIe extended capabilities (in order) */
+    pcie_cap_flr_init(pci_dev);
+
      if (pcie_aer_init(pci_dev, 1, 0x100, 0x40, errp) < 0) {
          hw_error("Failed to initialize AER capability");
      }
diff --git a/hw/net/igbvf.c b/hw/net/igbvf.c index
284ea611848b..0a58dad06802 100644
--- a/hw/net/igbvf.c
+++ b/hw/net/igbvf.c
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static void igbvf_write_config(PCIDevice *dev,
uint32_t addr, uint32_t val,  {
      trace_igbvf_write_config(addr, val, len);
      pci_default_write_config(dev, addr, val, len);
+    pcie_cap_flr_write_config(dev, addr, val, len);
  }

  static uint64_t igbvf_mmio_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
@@ -266,6 +267,8 @@ static void igbvf_pci_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error
**errp)
          hw_error("Failed to initialize PCIe capability");
      }

+    pcie_cap_flr_init(dev);

Sorry for my naive question, and perhaps not related to your patch, IGBVF 
device class doesn't seem to have any reset functions registered via 
igbvf_class_init(). So, I am guessing an FLR will not trigger igb_vf_reset(), 
which is probably what we want.

It does through the VTCTRL registers.

You're right. Advertising FLR capability without implementing it can confuse 
the guest though such probability is quite a low in practice. The reset should 
be implemented first.


I was looking at an issue from a VFIO perspective which does a FLR
on a device when pass through. Software and FLR are equivalent for
a VF.

They should be equivalent according to the datasheet, but unfortunately current 
igbvf implementation does nothing when reset. What Sriram proposes is to add 
code to actually write VTCTRL when FLR occurred and make FLR and software reset 
equivalent. And I think that should be done before this change; you should 
advertise FLR capability after the reset is actually implemented.


AFAICT, the VFs are reset correctly by the OS when created or probed and
by QEMU when they are passthrough in a nested guest OS (with this patch).
igb_vf_reset() is clearly called in QEMU, see routine e1000_reset_hw_vf()
in Linux.

I don't think this patch makes difference for e1000_reset_hw_vf() as it does 
not rely on FLR.


I don't think a reset op is necessary because VFs are software constructs
but I don't mind really. If so, then, I wouldn't mimic what the OS does
by writing the RST bit in the CTRL register of the VF, I would simply
install igb_vf_reset() as a reset handler.

Thinking about the reason why VFIO performs FLR, probably VFIO expects the FLR 
clears all of states the kernel set to prevent the VF from leaking kernel 
addresses or addresses of other user space which the VF was assigned to in the 
past, for example.

yes and if the FLR cap is not present, VFIO tries to do a custom bus reset
which fails in an ugly way since the PF can not be reset.

Thanks

C.



Implementing the reset operation is not necessary to make it function but to 
make it secure, particularly we promise the guest that we clear the VF state by 
advertising FLR.

Regards,
Akihiko Odaki


Thanks,

C.




Regards,
Akihiko Odaki


I am not sure a VF needs more really, since it is all controlled
by the PF. >
C.



+
      if (pcie_aer_init(dev, 1, 0x100, 0x40, errp) < 0) {
          hw_error("Failed to initialize AER capability");
      }
--
2.40.1








Reply via email to