On Mon, 5 Jun 2023 at 15:08, Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > When I run them manually without the timeout patch, I get these > values: > > qtest-aarch64/test-hmp OK 168.66s 95 subtests passed > qtest-aarch64/qom-test OK 646.37s 94 subtests passed > qtest-arm/qom-test OK 621.64s 89 subtests passed > qtest-arm/npcm7xx_pwm-test OK 225.48s 24 subtests passed > qtest-ppc64/pxe-test OK 96.95s 2 subtests passed > qtest-sparc/prom-env-test OK 95.94s 3 subtests passed > qtest-sparc/boot-serial-test OK 92.96s 3 subtests passed
The qom-tests being slow is kind of expected, since they have to go through every board and device, and there are a lot of arm boards and devices. That npcm7xx_pwm-test runtime is a bit OTT though for something testing a single device. Would one of the Nuvoton maintainers like to take a look at that test and make it a bit less of a hog of runtime ? thanks -- PMM
