On Thu, Jul 13 2023, Gavin Shan <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The CPU type 'host-arm-cpu' class won't be registered until KVM or
> HVF is configured in target/arm/cpu64.c. Support the corresponding
> CPU type only when KVM or HVF is configured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gs...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/arm/virt.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 43d7772ffd..ad28634445 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,9 @@ static const char *valid_cpu_types[] = {
> #endif
> ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-a53"),
> ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-a57"),
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KVM) || defined(CONFIG_HVF)
> ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("host"),
> +#endif
> ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("max"),
> NULL
> };
Doesn't the check in parse_cpu_option() already catch the case where
the "host" cpu model isn't registered? I might be getting lost in the
code flow, though.
