Hi All
Nothing causes more debate than the whole release / don't release topic. Maybe its good to lay out the plans for the medium term future: - Release 1.7 as the last general point release in the 1.x series - Make subsequent 1.7.x bug fixes while we work on 2.0 - Precede 2.0 with 1.9.x preview releases (which will not be publicised widely) - Release 2.0 - our optimistic hope was for a September release but (apologies to Gary) I suspect we will miss that target and year end will be more likely. @Markus I am going to try to maintain the 1.7 branch with bugfixes so that we can release 1.7.1 etc >From my usage, 1.7 is more stable and usable than 1.6. Almost all software I know of ships with bugs and even crashes. Even gnome 3.0 which I love dies on me now and again. Of course we want to release stable software, but we also want to put improvements out there regularly so that others can benefit from ongoing improvements and new features. I agree with Marco, Juergen and others - lets go on and release so that we can focus our energies on 2.0. Regards Tim On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Duarte Carreira <[email protected]> wrote: > Paolo, that's very true. And something I feel is related to the problem of > mind frames and cultural settings... It has to change somehow... one thing we > are missing is the ability to sell QGIS in this manner. And I mean sell in > the most commercial aspect. Having a commercial work force, not for licenses > but for bugs, quality and overall long term sustainability. Now there's a > challenge... > > If QGIS would send a letter to known users to raise funds would this be a > good/bad/so-so perspective? Or an annual fundraising appeal very much like > what Wikipedia does (http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/WMFJA085/en)? Both? > > Duarte > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Paolo Cavallini [mailto:[email protected]] > Enviada: quarta-feira, 1 de Junho de 2011 10:11 > Para: [email protected] > Assunto: Re: [Qgis-developer] release of 1.7 > > Il 01/06/2011 10:51, Duarte Carreira ha scritto: > >> There are mind frames, and cultural difficulties (besides lack >> of money)... I first need to establish QGIS in the enterprise, and later on >> propose spending money... not the other way around. > > Good point - a classic catch-22 situation. Anyway, there are already larger > institutions using QGIS, they just invest globally very little to nothing in > crucial > issues like quality control, autotesting, bugfixing. > I encourage everybody in this situation to find one or more additional devs > to deal > with these issues. > All the best. > > -- > Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) ============================================== Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming and support services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net ============================================== _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
