On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Giovanni Manghi <giovanni.man...@faunalia.pt> wrote: >> That would be great. IMHO, the single most important thing in releasing 2.0, >> from an >> user point of view, is to get rid of the duplications. All the rest comes >> second, > > about duplications please remember that right not it now possible to > just "get rid" of both the old symbology and labelling. The new ones > are missing features that are available in the old ones and that are > quite important when styling a map.
Giovanni, would you volunteer for creating a list of missing features in both new symbology and labeling - compared to the old ones? We have a wiki page for that, however it has been merely converted to a page with feature requests... it would need cleaning to a bare minimum to actually get the idea what is really missing - and how important the missing features are. http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/17/Switching_from_Old_to_New_Symbology_and_Labeling I would suggest that at some point we have to switch to new symbology even if there are missing features, otherwise we could postpone the switch forever, waiting for re-implementation of some features. Martin _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
