Dear All,
I followed your discussion with interest and I have a feeling there are
two aspects to be considered: One is the developer's perspective and one
is the user's perspective.
From a developer's perspective there is the api change, new raster
architecture (and a lot more I cannot name, basically "under the hood").
From a user's perspective 2.0 should be clearly distinguishable from
1.* (icons, GUI) and things long introduced (new symbology, new
labelling) should be standard and work reliably but without regression
compared to the old methods.
So the project should take its time to satisfy both perspectives.
my two cents
Bernhard
__________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature
database 7290 (20120711) __________
The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
