Yeah if we could flick it on it would make a load of difference to how clean the code is.
- Nathan On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Martin, hi List > > On 04.01.2013 22:19, Martin Dobias wrote: > > Hi Matthias > > > > thanks for your mail. > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> You've been talking about updating to PyQt4 SIP version 2. I noticed > this > >> change did not yet happen. What are your plans regarding this update? > > Yes, the plans are still there. I'm only wondering what would be the > > best time to switch - right now within the branch or a bit later once > > the branch is merged and the new code settles down a bit? I can see a > > slight advantage of the latter approach of having a greater chance of > > separating problems caused by the merge and problems caused by the SIP > > API change, but I do not have a strong opinion here. > > > > > Despite feature freeze, I'd like to ask what happened to that plan. As > far as I know, this change has not been made, and if this change is not > made before QGIS 2.0 it will have to wait for 3.0 (This is not something > to be done for 2.1). > It will probably be a small change (to switch in the core) but with a > huge impace (concerning plugins). > > Matthias > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
