-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/02/2013 03:10 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi Martin, hi List > > On 04.01.2013 22:19, Martin Dobias wrote: >> Hi Matthias >> >> thanks for your mail. >> >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> wrote: >>> You've been talking about updating to PyQt4 SIP version 2. I noticed this >>> change did not yet happen. What are your plans regarding this update? >> Yes, the plans are still there. I'm only wondering what would be the >> best time to switch - right now within the branch or a bit later once >> the branch is merged and the new code settles down a bit? I can see a >> slight advantage of the latter approach of having a greater chance of >> separating problems caused by the merge and problems caused by the SIP >> API change, but I do not have a strong opinion here. >> >> > Despite feature freeze, I'd like to ask what happened to that plan. As > far as I know, this change has not been made, and if this change is not > made before QGIS 2.0 it will have to wait for 3.0 (This is not something > to be done for 2.1). > It will probably be a small change (to switch in the core) but with a > huge impace (concerning plugins).
I would also vote to switch now when API is broken. - -- Ivan Mincik -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRWypZAAoJEPfdLsR5UpoeXIMIAKw/IIaDGdRGlF8Q2tKpbvnR VrjteXlFQB+u2g+X6DCgSnbQKUEdpS+HflFJjVVNcTIUMOarMx0qn8nMe8MUiSVE C/IpKvysW4FlF/bhSdpER/yj42oVNBfzcc+eX6rfZl3qNoidNGN6U+2hvpMDKLX0 oPr6YqPUNwjj9L+MlaV70jBM3kZSPs9dBx9cvktBZeXWH0n9iJpB4vpsSgb6SwDa CYL6IJZSwCohVdQ7pWOUnb0eQ/Te2GKx9sv22Tlh1rahr7VBWBrKCXssyrkDNiDL ZjACCof+DxkUOGASDOpFCVbLQDWZsbC2s6eeZxlXNNswycxGch+p2idKeozPluA= =spqX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
