So what's the hard deadline for SIP, this coming weekend?



On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Mathieu Pellerin <nirvn.a...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I feel that for the SIP upgrade to be considered so late in the release
>> process, it should be considered within _reasonable confines_ to avoid
>> un-managed, harmful delays. Ideally, something along the lines of "merged
>> by this coming Sunday or delayed to post 2.0". If the attempt at
>> upgrading SIP is turning out to be more complex and take longer than a hard
>> commit-to-master deadline, it IMO should be postponed on practical grounds
>> of avoiding impact on QGIS end users and adoption.
>>
>
> This is the current plan.  Victor is working on updating sextante this
> week, and Alex is working on fTools, noone has put their hands up for the
> others (DBManger, mapserver export) yet but I will try my hand at them if I
> get time.
>
> The SIP update must happen now or it can't happen in the future without
> breaking everything yet again, and that will do more damage to the project
> then some slight breakages in plugins while they update to 2.0.  The SIP
> update is a easy one, for the core code base and plugin authors, and I only
> have to check one thing with Martin before I will merge it into master
> (after most of the core plugins are done).
>
> - Nathan
>
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to