Hi After much thinking and considering some suggestions, I think it would be a good idea to remove the SEXTANTE branding, and just have everything with a more descriptive name, such as "geoanalysis", "processing", or something like that. In the long-term, that will help to integrate the analysis framework into QGIS,and help users locate it.
It shouldn't be more difficult than just replacing string ocurrences, but before doing such a big (and potentially troublesome) change, I would like to hear the opinion you guys have about this (is it a good idea? what name should we use instead of "sextante" for packages and modules? any good refactoring tool that you recommend?,etc) I am going to be out of office next week, so I might not read my email everyday, but it would be great to hear what you think about it. Once I am back, I will proceed to change it, I discussed it briefly with Tim and Paolo, who agreed on this, so I assumme this is not incompatible with the API freeze and the release plan that we have, but if anyone thinks this shouldn't be done now, please say it. I personally think that it would be good to have it in 2.0, so all analysis stuff is called "analysis" (or whatever) and not with a name that (although I like and feel very identified with it) for most people doesn't make much sense... Thanks in advance. Victor _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
