I guess instead that much better should be a group checkbox that
enable/disable the under childs layer.
This allow OFF the actual configuration or ON that same configuration.
Actually the group checkbox when checked put ON all the layer.
This often is mean too much information .
Instead the mutual exclusive need to choose only one.
And in that case disable and ri-enable will reput the same original clayer.
Andrea.
On 10/10/2013 10:08, Vincent Schut wrote:
On 10/09/2013 11:41 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
Personally, I am also interested in enhancing group options in
the layer
tree. Groups are not just stupid containers with only toggling of
visibility. They could also have a group opacity and blending and
group
metadata. Later on we may also have clipping and masking on
groups. So
we really should have an extensible mechanism for groups as new group
features appear.
One thing I'd love to see is the ability to make the layers in a
group "mutually exclusive". (ie, imagine radio buttons instead of
checkboxes for controlling the visibility of layers within that
group). I find I'm often going through a process of switching one
layer on, then switching a bunch of other layers off for comparison
purposes. A mutually exclusive layer group which automatically
switched the other child layers off when I select a layer would make
this process much nicer!
+1 for this feature from a frequent user!
Best,
Vincent.
Nyall
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
