On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:33:05AM +0000, Andreas Neumann wrote: > Am 11.10.2013 09:22, schrieb Sandro Santilli: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 09:13:03AM +0000, Duarte Carreira wrote: > >> The group checkbox, imho, should *not always* switch children on/off. You > >> should have a modifier to get this as a secondary behavior, like pressing > >> the ctrl key when (un)checking the group checkbox. The primary behavior of > >> the group switch should be to make the children invisible or visible, > >> regardless of the children's visibility being on or off. > >> > >> In the primary behavior when the parent is turned OFF, the children are > >> not drawn but retain their checked or uncheck status. > >> If you use the secondary behavior then unchecking the parent will uncheck > >> the children. Same would apply when checking the parent on. > > > > Agreed, sounds like a sensible behavior to me. > > > > Yes, a sensible behavior. > > But there is still use-case for the radio-button like behaviour. Imagine > having a group with a series of orthoimages of different years and you > quickly want to see each year. In this case, the radio-button behaviour > would save you one click. So I don't think that this contradicts the > other proposal listed above here.
Maybe this could be obtained with secondary behavior (SHIFT-click) on layers, but it sounds like something that easily becomes confusing (conflicting with radio-on-groups, undefined behavior for unchecking etc.). --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
