On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:25:21PM +0200, Bernhard Ströbl wrote: > I understand this in the way I wrote in my last message. You would > make the children visible/unvisible "regardless of the children's > visibility being on or off".
Indeed that wording was a bit confusing to me. If you confirm you meant that a layer could be visible on canvas without it being set to "visible" then I disagree about that. > Am 11.10.2013 12:09, schrieb Sandro Santilli: > >On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:02:08PM +0200, Bernhard Ströbl wrote: > > > >>We would have these two cases: > >>1) Group is checked and although layer is unchecked it is visible > > > >I don't think this case exists. > > Why not? You check/uncheck a group and the layers are > visible/invisible depending on the group status not their individual > status. The way I see it is in that case you'd SHIFT-click thus changing the visibility state of every child layer, loosing the original visibility state of them. > >Because for me an unchecked layer should _never_ be shown. > > Same for me, _plus_ a checked layer should _always_ be shown Fine by me, as long as we have an "half-checked" state for the case in which c layer is set to visible but any ancestor makes it invisible. --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
