+1 for going with 4.8 as minimum version.
Marco
On 15.11.2013 07:56, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 15/11/2013 05:14, Martin Dobias ha scritto:
I do not like the idea of being held back from upgrading minimal
requirements by one distribution. I think it is fairly reasonable to
expect that only older software will work with older distributions.
Moreover, I guess the share of CentOS/Redhat users is quite low even
just among linux users because it is mainly server oriented. And even
then those users should not have trouble installing newer Qt from
third-party packages.
Finally, newer versions of Qt are also more stable - with a release of
new minor Qt version the older branch typically stops receiving
further bugfixes.
agreed fully - with tens of Linux distros, keeping with the one with the oldest
Qt is
a major drawback.
besides this, I think we should move forward with a decision: having the same
discussion as one year ago, and not taking a decision, would be pointless.
in short: +1 for 4.8, please send your opinion.
all the best.
- --
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
Corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlKFxaUACgkQ/NedwLUzIr6U3wCdFXzV0Nsv/K5w+Ygm8SeKiocf
dHQAoK/1xFM/bvPG9Wbl8TPX5uQ9RDiv
=Qx2k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
--
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
[email protected] http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
