On 04/28/2014 04:38 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Hi all. > Currently, plugins are tagged in a rather inefficient way. The list of > tags as displayed in the webapp (unsure whether tags used <3 times are > included) is: > > analysis cad cadastre calculator centroid composer database dem > digitizing ecology export feature field geometry google html import > inspire labeling land cover legend line load map metadata network > analysis openlayers openstreetmap osm point polygon polyline postgis > processing profile project python raster remote sensing routing sample > search selection service shape shapefile spatialite statistics style > time transparency vector web wkt wms > > Some of them are very little informative, and some plugin miss what is > apparently their most appropriate tag. > I would suggest all authors to rethink their tagging strategy, and > converge on the most useful ones. > Maybe someone could suggest a list of preferred tags? > > All the best. >
I would suggest we look for a way to allow the community to refine the tags on a given plugin. Upvote good tags, suggest new tags. Haven't checked but does the tagging system match as you type? Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
