2014-04-28 18:12 GMT+02:00 Alex Mandel <[email protected]>: > On 04/28/2014 04:38 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > > Hi all. > > Currently, plugins are tagged in a rather inefficient way. The list of > > tags as displayed in the webapp (unsure whether tags used <3 times are > > included) is: >
Yes. There is a limit, IIRC is 3. > > > > analysis cad cadastre calculator centroid composer database dem > > digitizing ecology export feature field geometry google html import > > inspire labeling land cover legend line load map metadata network > > analysis openlayers openstreetmap osm point polygon polyline postgis > > processing profile project python raster remote sensing routing sample > > search selection service shape shapefile spatialite statistics style > > time transparency vector web wkt wms > > > > Some of them are very little informative, and some plugin miss what is > > apparently their most appropriate tag. > > I would suggest all authors to rethink their tagging strategy, and > > converge on the most useful ones. > > Maybe someone could suggest a list of preferred tags? > > > > All the best. > > > > I would suggest we look for a way to allow the community to refine the > tags on a given plugin. Upvote good tags, suggest new tags. > > Haven't checked but does the tagging system match as you type? > > Sure, but the garbage comes from metadata.txt -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
