On 24/08/2014 7:41 pm, "Marco Hugentobler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Nyall > > Having another process to nominate QEP voters sounds too complicated to me. > > > >not everyone on the psc is a developer or has c++ coding experience > > There is a mix of coders and non-coders in the PSC on purpose. Developers sometimes have a narrow point of view, so it is good that also non-developers have a say. In the discussion part of the QEP, the consequences for users can be mentioned. I don't consider that a problem, even for very technical subjects (and even those usually have somehow an influence on the users of a software).
OK, fair enough. But would non-psc members be able to comment on proposals? > > I'm putting RFC/QEP on the agenda to discuss at the next PSC meeting ( http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/PSC_Meeting_5_September_2014). Great to hear - thanks! Nyall
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
